Jump to content

Template:Main page/First featured article: Difference between revisions

From Wikivahdat
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:الغدیر.jpg|175px|frameless|right|alt=Ramadan|Al-Ghadir and Islamic Unity]]
[[File:Quincy_Institute_for_Responsible_Statecraft.jpg |thumb|right|Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft]]


'''Al-Ghadir''' has raised a great wave in the Islamic world, and Islamic thinkers have paid a deep attention to it from various angles: literary, historical. theological, traditional , social, and analytical. What interests us from the social angle is Islamic unity. Islamic reformers and enlightened scholars of our era consider the unity and adherence of Islamic nations and sects as the most urgent of Islamic need, particularly under the present conditions when they are being assaulted by the enemy from every side, who is constantly employing all kinds of means to develop old offenses and invent new ones.  
A report published by ''Responsible Statecraft'' on April 14, 2026, alleged that several [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]]-based [[think tank]]s played a prominent role in promoting [[United States|U.S.]]-[[Israel]]i military action against [[Iran]] in the months leading up to a conflict that began on February 28, 2026 (Lobe, 2026).[[Alleged Role of U.S. Think Tanks in Promoting Military Action Against Iran: A Report|'''Continue ...''']]</span>
 
<span id="mp-more">[[Al-Ghadir and Islamic Unity|'''Continue ...''']]</span>

Latest revision as of 14:39, 19 April 2026

Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft

A report published by Responsible Statecraft on April 14, 2026, alleged that several Washington-based think tanks played a prominent role in promoting U.S.-Israeli military action against Iran in the months leading up to a conflict that began on February 28, 2026 (Lobe, 2026).Continue ...