Think tank

From Wikivahdat
Revision as of 11:11, 26 November 2024 by Peysepar (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

A think tank, also known as a policy institute, is an organization dedicated to research and advocacy on various subjects, including social policy, political strategy, economics, military affairs, technology, and culture.

Funding

While most think tanks operate as non-profit entities, some function as semi-autonomous government agencies, and others are linked to specific political parties, businesses, or the military.[1] Funding for these institutions typically comes from individual donations, although many also receive government grants.[2]

Outputs

Think tanks generate articles and studies, and may also create policy recommendations on certain issues. These outputs are utilized by governments, corporations, media outlets, social movements, and other interest groups.[3] The spectrum of think tanks varies greatly—from those engaged in rigorous academic research to those that are explicitly ideological and advocate for specific policies, exhibiting a range of research quality. Recent think tanks have increasingly leaned toward ideological agendas.[4]

Historical Context

The modern think tank phenomenon emerged in some European countries during the19th and early20th centuries, initially focusing on the economic challenges brought by industrialization and urbanization.[5] The establishment of many American and Western think tanks during the Cold War was instrumental in shaping Cold War policies. Since 1991, there has been a rise in think tanks in non-Western regions, with over half of the current think tanks founded after 1980.[6] Today, there are more than11,000 think tanks globally.[7]

Categories

Think tanks differ based on ideological leanings, funding sources, focus areas, and intended audiences.[8] In the U.S., for example, some donors may seek to influence parliamentary votes or shape public opinion, while others may aim to position themselves or funded experts for future government roles or advocate for particular research areas. Think tanks can be classified into several types, such as independent, quasi-independent, government-affiliated, quasi-governmental, university-affiliated, political-party-affiliated, or corporate-affiliated.[9]

A growing trend due to globalization is the collaboration among policy institutes from different countries. For instance, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace has offices in Washington, D.C., Beijing, Beirut, Brussels, and previously in Moscow (which closed in April2022). The Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) at the University of Pennsylvania, led by James McGann, evaluates and ranks policy institutes worldwide across various categories, releasing their findings in the Global Go-To Think Tanks index, though this evaluation method has faced criticism from some scholars.[10]

Engagement Activities

Think tanks engage with the public by hosting conferences that may be broadcasted, encouraging scholars to present public lectures, testifying in government committee hearings, publishing and distributing various types of publications, creating mailing lists for new releases, and utilizing social media.They may also seek to influence policy behind the scenes by placing members in bureaucratic roles, appointing members to political advisory boards, inviting decision-makers to their events, employing former policymakers, or conducting studies for policymakers.[11]

Theoretical Perspectives

Think tanks can be understood through social theory frameworks. Plehwe suggests that they function as knowledge brokers within networks that include academic collaborations and connections with media, political entities, and corporate funders, facilitating the formation of discourse coalitions with shared goals—such as the deregulatory changes in industries like trucking, airlines, and telecommunications in the1970s.[12]

Elite theory examines how elites might influence think tank operations and potentially circumvent traditional political processes. This perspective analyzes the social backgrounds and values of think tank personnel. However, Pautz critiques this view for overlooking the diversity of thought present in think tanks and minimizing the potential impact of ideas.[13]

Advocacy Roles

Corporate, military, and political interests sometimes establish think tanks or advocacy organizations to promote their agendas.[14] For instance, the Advancement of Sound Science Coalition was created in the mid-1990s to counter research linking second-hand smoke to cancer. Military contractors may allocate funds to support pro-war think tanks. Despite being portrayed as impartial experts, many think tank "specialists" often represent specific ideological viewpoints.[15]

References

  1. Fang, Lee (15 September 2021). "Intelligence Contract Funneled to Pro-War Think Tank Establishment". The Intercept. Archived from the original on 6 October 2021. Retrieved 9 October 2021.
  2. McGann, James G.; Weaver, Robert Kent (1 January 2002). Think Tanks and Civil Societies: Catalysts for Ideas and Action. Transaction Publishers. p. 51. ISBN 978-1-4128-3989-1.
  3. Fischer, Frank; Miller, Gerald J. (21 December 2006). "Public Policy Analysis and Think Tanks, by Diane Stone". Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods. CRC Press. pp. 149–157. ISBN 978-1-4200-1700-7.
  4. Fischer, Frank; Miller, Gerald J. (21 December 2006). "Public Policy Analysis and Think Tanks, by Diane Stone". Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods. CRC Press. pp. 149–157. ISBN 978-1-4200-1700-7.
  5. McGann, James. "Think Tanks and the Transnationalization of Foreign Policy". Foreign Policy Research Institute. Archived from the original on 29 June 2011.
  6. McGann, James. "Think Tanks and the Transnationalization of Foreign Policy". Foreign Policy Research Institute. Archived from the original on October 20 2024.
  7. G. McGann, James (28 January 2022). "2020 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report". University of Pennsylvania. Archived from the original on 22 May 2021. Retrieved October 20, 2024
  8. Singer, Peter (13 August 2010). "Washington's Think Tanks: Factories to Call Our Own". the Brookings Institution. Archived from the original on 21 August 2010.
  9. Singer, Peter (13 August 2010). "Washington's Think Tanks: Factories to Call Our Own". the Brookings Institution. Archived from the original on 21 August 2010.
  10. McGann, James G (2020). "2020 Global Go To Think Tanks Index Report". University of Pennsylvania Scholarly Commons. Archived from the original on 22 May 2021. Retrieved October 20 2024.
  11. Buldioski, Goran. "Mirror, mirror on the wall... tell me who is the best think tank in the world?". Goran's Musings. Archived from the original on 13 January 2012. Retrieved October 20, 2024.
  12. Plehwe, Dieter (Octoberber 20 2024), "The politics of policy think-tanks: organizing expertise, legitimacy and counter-expertise in policy networks", Handbook of Critical Policy Studies, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 358–379, ISBN 978-1-78347-235-2, retrieved October 20, 2024
  13. Pautz, Hartwig (2011). "Revisiting the think-tank phenomenon". Public Policy and Administration. 26 (4): 419–435. doi:10.1177/0952076710378328. ISSN 0952-0767.
  14. Lipton, Eric; Williams, Brooke (7 August 2016). "Researchers or Corporate Allies? Think Tanks Blur the Line; Think tanks are seen as independent, but their scholars often push donors' agendas, amplifying a culture of corporate influence in Washington". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 11 July 2019. Retrieved October 20 2024.
  15. "The Incredible Shrinking Think Tank". FAIR. 22 February 1999. Archived from the original on 21 September 2012. Retrieved October 20 2024.