Jump to content

Template:Main page/third featured article: Difference between revisions

From Wikivahdat
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:RAND_Corporation.jpg|300px|right]]
[[File:Al-Ghadir book.jpg|frameless|right]]
The '''Rand Corporation''' is a nonprofit research organization that provides analysis and recommendations to policymakers on a wide range of issues, including national security, international relations, and global challenges. One of the main concentrations of Rand's research is related to Islam, Islamic countries, and Iran, particularly in the context of international relations and security.
The '''Event of Ghadir Khumm''' has been a subject of interest and debate within Western world|Western academic study of [[Islam]], commonly referred to as Orientalism|Orientalist scholarship. The event, in which [[Muhammad|Prophet Muhammad]] declared at the pond of Khumm on 18 Dhu al-Hijjah, 10 AH (March 632 CE), "He whose master (''Mawla|mawlā'') I am, this Ali|ʿAlī is his master," holds central importance in [[Shia Islam|Shīʿa]] doctrine regarding succession to Muhammad. Orientalist approaches to this event have evolved significantly over time—from near-total neglect in early Western biographies to critical examination and, more recently, broader historiographical acceptance of its historical core (Rizvi, 1996; Vaglieri, 1965)
<span id="mp-more">[[Rand Corporation|'''Continue ...''']]</span>
<span id="mp-more">[[Ghadir Khumm from the perspective of Orientalist scholarship|'''Continue ...''']]</span>

Latest revision as of 12:39, 2 June 2026

The Event of Ghadir Khumm has been a subject of interest and debate within Western world|Western academic study of Islam, commonly referred to as Orientalism|Orientalist scholarship. The event, in which Prophet Muhammad declared at the pond of Khumm on 18 Dhu al-Hijjah, 10 AH (March 632 CE), "He whose master (Mawla|mawlā) I am, this Ali|ʿAlī is his master," holds central importance in Shīʿa doctrine regarding succession to Muhammad. Orientalist approaches to this event have evolved significantly over time—from near-total neglect in early Western biographies to critical examination and, more recently, broader historiographical acceptance of its historical core (Rizvi, 1996; Vaglieri, 1965) Continue ...