Jump to content

Template:Main page/third featured article: Difference between revisions

From Wikivahdat
Javadi (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Abdul Malik al-Houthi.jpg|300px|right]]
[[File:Al-Ghadir book.jpg|frameless|right]]
'''Abdul-Malik al-Houthi''', born on 22 May 1979, is a prominent Yemeni politician and religious leader who has been the second and current leader of the Houthi movement, also known as Ansar Allah, since 2004.
The '''Event of Ghadir Khumm''' has been a subject of interest and debate within Western world|Western academic study of [[Islam]], commonly referred to as Orientalism|Orientalist scholarship. The event, in which [[Muhammad|Prophet Muhammad]] declared at the pond of Khumm on 18 Dhu al-Hijjah, 10 AH (March 632 CE), "He whose master (''Mawla|mawlā'') I am, this Ali|ʿAlī is his master," holds central importance in [[Shia Islam|Shīʿa]] doctrine regarding succession to Muhammad. Orientalist approaches to this event have evolved significantly over time—from near-total neglect in early Western biographies to critical examination and, more recently, broader historiographical acceptance of its historical core (Rizvi, 1996; Vaglieri, 1965)
[[The Houthi movement]] is primarily composed of [[Zaydi Shia Muslim]]s and has been a significant force in Yemen's political landscape, particularly during the ongoing Yemeni Civil War.
<span id="mp-more">[[Ghadir Khumm from the perspective of Orientalist scholarship|'''Continue ...''']]</span>
 
<span id="mp-more">[[Abdul-Malik al-Houthi|'''Continue ...''']]</span>

Latest revision as of 12:39, 2 June 2026

The Event of Ghadir Khumm has been a subject of interest and debate within Western world|Western academic study of Islam, commonly referred to as Orientalism|Orientalist scholarship. The event, in which Prophet Muhammad declared at the pond of Khumm on 18 Dhu al-Hijjah, 10 AH (March 632 CE), "He whose master (Mawla|mawlā) I am, this Ali|ʿAlī is his master," holds central importance in Shīʿa doctrine regarding succession to Muhammad. Orientalist approaches to this event have evolved significantly over time—from near-total neglect in early Western biographies to critical examination and, more recently, broader historiographical acceptance of its historical core (Rizvi, 1996; Vaglieri, 1965) Continue ...