Jump to content

Template:Main page/third featured article: Difference between revisions

From Wikivahdat
Mahdipor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(28 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:سید عبدالملک حوثی .jpg|300px|right]]
[[File:Al-Ghadir book.jpg|frameless|right]]
'''Sayyid Abdul-Malik al-Houthi''', also known as Abu Jabr'il, is the spiritual leader of the Ansar Allah movement in Yemen, also known as the Zaidi Shia movement in Yemen, and the commander-in-chief of the Ansar Allah fighters in Yemen since 2004.
The '''Event of Ghadir Khumm''' has been a subject of interest and debate within Western world|Western academic study of [[Islam]], commonly referred to as Orientalism|Orientalist scholarship. The event, in which [[Muhammad|Prophet Muhammad]] declared at the pond of Khumm on 18 Dhu al-Hijjah, 10 AH (March 632 CE), "He whose master (''Mawla|mawlā'') I am, this Ali|ʿAlī is his master," holds central importance in [[Shia Islam|Shīʿa]] doctrine regarding succession to Muhammad. Orientalist approaches to this event have evolved significantly over time—from near-total neglect in early Western biographies to critical examination and, more recently, broader historiographical acceptance of its historical core (Rizvi, 1996; Vaglieri, 1965)
<span id="mp-more">[[Sayyid Abdul-Malik al-Houthi|'''Continue ...''']]</span>
<span id="mp-more">[[Ghadir Khumm from the perspective of Orientalist scholarship|'''Continue ...''']]</span>

Latest revision as of 12:39, 2 June 2026

The Event of Ghadir Khumm has been a subject of interest and debate within Western world|Western academic study of Islam, commonly referred to as Orientalism|Orientalist scholarship. The event, in which Prophet Muhammad declared at the pond of Khumm on 18 Dhu al-Hijjah, 10 AH (March 632 CE), "He whose master (Mawla|mawlā) I am, this Ali|ʿAlī is his master," holds central importance in Shīʿa doctrine regarding succession to Muhammad. Orientalist approaches to this event have evolved significantly over time—from near-total neglect in early Western biographies to critical examination and, more recently, broader historiographical acceptance of its historical core (Rizvi, 1996; Vaglieri, 1965) Continue ...