Template:Main page/third featured article: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 12:39, 2 June 2026

The Event of Ghadir Khumm has been a subject of interest and debate within Western world|Western academic study of Islam, commonly referred to as Orientalism|Orientalist scholarship. The event, in which Prophet Muhammad declared at the pond of Khumm on 18 Dhu al-Hijjah, 10 AH (March 632 CE), "He whose master (Mawla|mawlā) I am, this Ali|ʿAlī is his master," holds central importance in Shīʿa doctrine regarding succession to Muhammad. Orientalist approaches to this event have evolved significantly over time—from near-total neglect in early Western biographies to critical examination and, more recently, broader historiographical acceptance of its historical core (Rizvi, 1996; Vaglieri, 1965) Continue ...

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-[[File:Le Mahomet des historiens.jpg|thumb|]]
+[[File:Al-Ghadir book.jpg|frameless|right]]
-'''Le Mahomet des historiens''' (''The Muhammad of the Historians'') is a 2025 Edited volume|collective work edited by [[Mohammad Ali Amir-Moezzi]] and [[John Tolan]] and published by Éditions du Cerf. The book is a contribution to the academic study of the [[Prophet Muhammad]] in [[historiography]] and [[Islamic studies]]. Unlike traditional biographical works (''[[Sīra]]''), it does not aim to reconstruct a single narrative of Muhammad's life. Instead, it examines how Muhammad’s figure has been constructed, perceived, and used across different historical, cultural, and religious contexts.
+The '''Event of Ghadir Khumm''' has been a subject of interest and debate within Western world|Western academic study of [[Islam]], commonly referred to as Orientalism|Orientalist scholarship. The event, in which [[Muhammad|Prophet Muhammad]] declared at the pond of Khumm on 18 Dhu al-Hijjah, 10 AH (March 632 CE), "He whose master (''Mawla|mawlā'') I am, this Ali|ʿAlī is his master," holds central importance in [[Shia Islam|Shīʿa]] doctrine regarding succession to Muhammad. Orientalist approaches to this event have evolved significantly over time—from near-total neglect in early Western biographies to critical examination and, more recently, broader historiographical acceptance of its historical core (Rizvi, 1996; Vaglieri, 1965)
-<span id="mp-more">[[Le Mahomet des historiens: Analysis of Research Methods and Methodologies|'''Continue ...''']]</span>
+<span id="mp-more">[[Ghadir Khumm from the perspective of Orientalist scholarship|'''Continue ...''']]</span>